In the same way that the stock market is, it is questioned
whether or not you need skill or utter luck in order to be successful in
fantasy sport leagues. As an unsuccessful member of the fantasy league
community I can confidently say that this is down to luck, however there are
many out there that disagree.
So that begs the question, would insider information for a
fantasy league be beneficial for an individual or would it simply be random
useless information? In the case of DraftKings and rival company FanDuel, it is
evidently very beneficial as one of DraftKings employees played on the site of
FanDuel and won $350,000 in one week (www.ft.com, 2015).
DraftKings have argued that the information that this
employee had access to was not available in time for them to make an
alterations to their roster. Major League baseball have expressed their shock
that DraftKings allow their employees to participate in fantasy contests
altogether, most likely because all employees will have more market knowledge
than any normal member of the public and will surely lead to an unfair benefit.
Another article in The Financial Times has explored the
ongoing investigation into whether or not daily and weekly contests in fantasy
leagues are a form of online gambling or simply a game of skill. This is very
interesting because if this is classed as online gambling then the overriding
factor in winning would be luck. So any insider information would not benefit
the individual participating in the fantasy game. However if it is seen as a
game based on skill and knowledge, then to use any insider information is seen
as not only immoral, but also illegal (Arnold, 2013).
Unless the employee had won this obscene amount of money
from just pure luck it is quite apparent that the only other likelihood is that
whatever knowledge they possessed has been used to their advantage. If this is
the case then it seems farcical that there are no regulations or guidelines that
have been put in place to prevent employees that work for daily or weekly
fantasy leagues from participating, as they have a clear advantage over the
general public.
After deliberating on this issue for some time I have come
to a conclusion that the employee is not the main culprit for this situation,
as they have simply made the most out of an opportunity that was available to
them (even if it is frowned upon by many) and have taken advantage over a
market that clearly does not run efficiently. The fault here lays with the
authorities and the organisations for not having the necessary principles and
regulations in order to make this market a fair one for all to compete in.
Please comment if you disagree or agree with any of my
points, or even if you have anything additional that I have not discussed.
Over and Out
No comments:
Post a Comment